Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3051 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 46% better in New World than Core i3-6320 - 164 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 32 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$853.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$853.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1298
42.980132450331126%
Multi-Core
2618
14.329501915708812%
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |