Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 490 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G3930 - 255 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
48.17749603803487%
Multi-Core
1043
41.07916502560063%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
