Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 2423 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-6300 - 215 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$148.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$148.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
62.1981271562346%
Multi-Core
2539
29.734160908771518%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |