Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 420 days older than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 51 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 44 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76790 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 22 |
4 | Threads | 44 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |