Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - CA$140.0 vs CA$383.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-10700 - CA$0.56 vs CA$1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 6% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-6100 - 263 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
249
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
263
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$383.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |