Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4519 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 73 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 77% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-560 - 785 vs 443 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Single-Core
443
14.267310789049919%
Multi-Core
932
4.2687674620986575%
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
