Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2191 days newer than Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4360 - 124 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$639.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$639.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1170
69.8090692124105%
Multi-Core
2318
27.51008782340375%
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |