Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2060 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4330 - 132 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4330 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
125
94.6969696969697%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$63.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$63.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |