Buy on Amazon
CA$63.33
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1318 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - CA$63.33 vs CA$307.08
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-4330 - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core I3-4330 I3 4330 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 4M 54W LGA 1150
Buy for CA$63.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processor (YD160XBCAEWOF)
Buy for CA$307.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
94.92430988423864%
Multi-Core
2144
44.98531263113722%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
