Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1953 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 28% better in F1 23 than Core i3-4160T - 237 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 64 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2000
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |