Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 3425 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4160T - 152 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 28 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
936
37.802907915993536%
Multi-Core
1796
16.991485335856197%
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
