Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 693 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-4130 - 153 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
