Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3089 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$98.88 vs CA$839.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$0.31 vs CA$1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 54 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 83% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-4160 - 579 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
317
54.74956822107081%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7105 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
579
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
21.379310344827587%
Price, CA$
CA$839
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
36.46333104866347%
Multi-Core
2072
10.553659654663067%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |