Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2826 days newer than Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 44% better in Starfield than Core i3-4150T - 72 vs 50 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |