Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2511 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-4150 - 208 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$339.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
47.404371584699454%
Multi-Core
2047
23.50981968531067%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |