Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 324 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-9590 - 180 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 54 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
