Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2060 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - CA$84.99 vs CA$299.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i7-9700F - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Core i3-4130 - 180 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
173
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$84.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.67/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$299.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |