Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1858 days newer than Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4130 - 130 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
78.10047095761381%
Multi-Core
1960
26.294606922457742%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |