Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3399 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-390M - 286 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 20 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
286
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$699.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
347
19.839908519153802%
Multi-Core
686
7.4866310160427805%
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |