Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 2360 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 17% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-390M - 257 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 16 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-390M
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
