Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4822 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Deathloop than Core i3-380M - 204 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$856.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$856.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |