Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3794 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 28% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-380M - 145 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$319.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$319.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |