Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4745 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-350M - 131 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$288.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$288.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |