Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 2611 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-350M - 173 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
173
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$401.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$401.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |