Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 1020 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-350M - 213 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 8 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65633 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-350M | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |