Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1579 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3250 - 120 vs 111 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$63.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74952 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
42.730923694779115%
Multi-Core
1130
33.186490455212926%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |