Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 1941 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 55 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 43% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i3-3250 - 99 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 48 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$18.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1783
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,783 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12468 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |