Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2360 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-3250 - 191 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$912.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$912.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
31.220657276995308%
Multi-Core
1130
10.56469708302169%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |