Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2511 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 46% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3250 - 196 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14313 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |