Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 3817 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than Core i3-3240T - 188 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 48 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
