Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 1858 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 35 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3240T - 189 vs 168 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
30.325644504748983%
Multi-Core
971
22.911750825861255%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |