Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2639 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3240T - 279 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 64 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
279
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$2000
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76710 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
27.32273838630807%
Multi-Core
971
6.931753283837808%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |