Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2054 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-3240 - 204 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$368.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
44.78577202910267%
Multi-Core
1137
21.60364810944328%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |