Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3116 days newer than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 10% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3220T - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 12 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$619.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$619.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
21.583411875589068%
Multi-Core
941
11.492427943331705%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |