Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1583 days newer than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3220T - 117 vs 116 FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
75.32894736842105%
Multi-Core
941
90.22051773729626%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
