Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2639 days newer than Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 31% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3220T - 201 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 48 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
27.474505098980206%
Multi-Core
941
7.06615604115041%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |