Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220T outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3220T is 50 days older than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
144
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |