Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - CA$69.88 vs CA$387.75
- Up to 69% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-11700F - CA$0.53 vs CA$1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 68% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3220 - 224 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
133
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11470 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
224
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.73/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$387.75
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$387.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11471 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |