Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 327 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than FX-4100 - 163 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - CA$31.73 vs CA$202.5
- Up to 84% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-3220 - CA$0.2 vs CA$1.24 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
163
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
16.12903225806452%
Price, CA$
CA$202.5
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$202.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
162
99.38650306748467%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$31.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |