Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3504 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3217U - 158 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 12 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3217U | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
