Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2592 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 40% better in Rust than Core i3-3217U - 206 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$201.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$201.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3217U | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |