Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3052 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 37% better in Rust than Core i3-3210 - 214 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |