Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1918 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i3-3210 - 46 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
82.62987012987013%
Multi-Core
1018
96.86013320647004%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |