Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 334 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
96.46365422396856%
Multi-Core
825
81.04125736738703%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
