Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2100 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 55 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3210 - 182 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 48 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1783
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,783 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
41.21457489878543%
Multi-Core
1018
13.743755906574862%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |