Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3380 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 14% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3210 - 177 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
25.23549826474963%
Multi-Core
1018
11.211453744493392%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
