Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2378 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 66% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3210 - 404 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$409.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
30.029498525073745%
Multi-Core
1018
11.979289244528124%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |