Key Differences
In short — Core i7-965 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-965 is 1292 days older than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3110M - 150 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-3110M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
