Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3504 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3110M - 453 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$209.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65467 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |