Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i3-3110M vs Celeron G3900

Core i3-3110M vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1187 days newer than Core i3-3110M.

Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M

  • Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 6% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3110M - 145 vs 137 FPS
This is a free version of Dirt 5.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Core i3-3110M Logo
Core i3-3110M

Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012


FPS

137

94%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

145

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$0.15/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$21.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron G3900 2.8 Processor - Affordable and Reliable

Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 35 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra High

Intel Core i3-3110M Logo
Core i3-3110M

Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i3-3110M Logo
Core i3-3110M

Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012


Single-Core

389

66%

Multi-Core

802

80%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

100%

Intel Core i3-3110M Logo

Intel Core i3-3110M

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Jun 1st, 2012Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3CollectionCeleron
Ivy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel Socket G2 (988B)SocketIntel Socket 1151
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
4
Threads2
2.4 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
35 W
TDP51 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
24.0xMultiplier
28.0x
Intel HD 4000Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.